Is Dell UltraSharp U2713HM useful for home

Monitors

The Good The Dell UltraSharp U2713HM delivers excellent performance across the board, includes a huge array of customization options, and has great ergonomic support. USB 3.0 is a nice bonus.

The Bad There is a slight problem with green when watching movies, and $ 800 is a lot to pay for a monitor, no matter what is included.

The Bottom Line The Dell UltraSharp U2713HM is a great monitor that will satisfy both the functional snob and the diva function.

8.5 Overall

  • Design
    8
  • Features
    9
  • Performance
    9
  • Support
    8

The Dell UltraSharp U2713HM is not the absolute best monitor performer. And $ 799 is not the cheapest monitor. However, due to the price / price / performance / performance ratio, this is the best overall monitor currently.

This can be achieved by offering excellent screen resolution of 2560×1,440 pixels, deep ergonomic support, useful screen settings and an impressive array of connections.

If you can save $ 800, it’s a monitor.

Editors’ note: The U2713HM is essentially a larger version of the U2412 , with a few changes here and there. You may get a sense of deja vu if you’ve read both reviews.

The Dell UltraSharp U2713HM and lime green walls (pictures)

Design and features
“Thin and light” aren’t usually descriptors designed for 27-inch in-plane switching monitors (IPS), but in the curious case, the Dell UltraSharp U2713HM is as accurate a description of its physical features as I would think.

Unlike the U2711 since 2010, the U2713HM has LED backlight and uses the AH-IPS panel unlike the H-IPS panel used by the U2711. AH-IPS panels are a fairly new panel standard that supposedly provides high color accuracy while reducing power consumption. Check out the performance section to see how true this is.

The U2713UM LED backlight delivers a much slimmer design than previous series records. Initially, a 0.9-inch panel. It then narrows back to the back, where the connection options and ventilation system are located by 1.2 inches. This brings its collective depth to 2.1 inches; it’s 1.3 inches thinner than the U2711. With 13 pounds, we again see something out of the ordinary: a lightweight 27-inch IPS monitor. Unexpectedly, as they can easily gain 20 pounds.

The U2713HM is a lot thinner than Dell’s previous 27-inch monitor, the U2711; however, the U2713HM is not a replacement for that line. Josh Miller

The left and right side panels are 0.8 inches in size, and the full panel width is 25.2 inches. The foot rest sits 12.2 inches wide and 7.9 inches deep; however, a knock on the panel on the sides results in large vibrations on a flat surface. Not necessarily a discovery that destroys the earth, given its low weight.

The U2713HM has a complete collection of ergonomic options, including a 90-degree hinge, a 45-degree left and right turn, and a 20-degree back tilt. In addition, there is a 4.5-inch height adjustment screen, with panel-to-desktop space measuring 1.7 inches below and 6.2 inches above.

Video connection options include DisplayPort, DVI, HDMI and VGA; unfortunately they face downwards, not outwards. Connections on the monitors should be inverted, not down, as this simply makes it easier to connect and disconnect cables. Many smaller monitors do this, as do almost all TVs. It’s time we started seeing them on performance monitors. However, the rotary function causes a little less blood to flow from my nose when the monitor is connected.

From top: Two USB download, a single USB upload, a headphone jack, HDMI, DVI, VGA, and DisplayPort. Josh Miller

The On-Screen Display (OSD) array is located vertically along the bottom right panel and consists of four small but well-positioned buttons. Screen navigation is simple and clean. Dell still makes the best-designed display screens in the industry with a contextual navigation system that never forgets the function that every button has at any time.

The settings are robust and extensive, providing access to brightness, contrast and sharpness. Its seven different presets consist of standard, multimedia, motion picture, game, text, color temperature and RGB (sRBG). The color temperature preset lets you change the temperature from 5000 Kelvin to 10,000 K. The RGB preset lets you access the red, green and blue values ​​separately. However, one minor disappointment is that you cannot change the color temperature or the RGB value if they are in a different setting. However, you can increase both hue and saturation.

For the energy that is aware of you (all of you), an energy meter is located in the upper right corner of the OSD, which measures how much power the monitor uses. In addition, there is a Smart energy mode that dims the brightness depending on the amount of ambient light in the room.

The U2713HM’s OSD options are many. Josh Miller

As a by-product that is not accustomed to such lightweight IPS displays, it may be difficult to get used to something (a well-functioning IPS monitor) that felt so light and airy. In my opinion, IPS monitors should be those big hippos; to do the opposite was a little delayed. In fact, it’s a crazy personal thing, and it doesn’t really affect the quality of the monitor.

Design and feature highlights
Connectivity DVI, DisplayPort, VGA, HDMI
Ergonomic options 20-degree back tilt, 45-degree left and right swivel, 90-degree pivot, 4.5-inch height adjustment
Resolution 2,560×1,440 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:9
Audio Headphone jack
VESA wall mount support Yes
Included video cables DVI, VGA
Backlight LED
Panel type AH-IPS
Screen film Matte
Number of presets 7
Overdrive No
Picture options Brightness, Contrast, Sharpness
Color controls RGB and six color-temperature options
Gamma control Yes
Additional features USB downstream x4, USB upstream x1

Performance
I tested the Dell UltraSharp U2713m through its DVI input connected to a Windows 7 PC using the included DVI cable. A screen score of 98 for CNET lab performance tests was placed on the display.

DisplayMate: U2713HM displayed light gray to 253; 255 is considered white with every level in between, and 1 is a variation of gray, so 253 is almost as high as you can get. The performance of the U2713HM here indicates that the display will retain contrast and probably not prone to light colors. As for the dark gray, the U2713HM barely shows up to level 2, keeping the color black, indicating that the display is capable of storing dark details during dark scenes in movies.

The U2713HM proved to be excellent in all our color tests, demonstrating a tendency to display color clearly and smoothly without unexpected leaps in color gamut.

In our dark screen test, I look at a screen devoid of color, trying to identify the spots where the light from the backlight (known as “clouding”) seeps. Although there was clear cloudiness on the left edge of the screen, it was thankfully restricted there and never appeared again.

Text: The black text on the white looked clear, with no obvious color-tone issues. The fonts were also clearly visible up to 6.8 points.

Movies: I tested the Dell UltraSharp U2713HMm using Avatar’s Blu-ray version. The previous film provided a great movie viewing experience, displaying high contrast and bright looks, with rich colors and correspondingly deep blacks. I didn’t notice any problems with the glut of colors, but there was a slight green tint, which is often seen on characters’ faces.

Colors are accurate and vibrant on the U2713HM. Josh Miller

Games: When evaluating the appearance of games on your monitor, the two most important features to consider are brightness and color. If games with bright and clear clarity can be displayed on the monitor, it contributes to the benefits. If colors can also appear with fullness and depth, games can usually look great. Shooting causes a lot of concern, which, to be honest, is not very common for most modern monitors, but if you are concerned, be sure to read the last paragraph in this section.

Different is the lag of the input, which is, simply put, the time that elapses from the moment of typing the action with the keyboard, mouse or game board until you see that the action is represented on the screen. Each monitor has a degree of input lag, but only a very small percentage of people even notice it. That being said, I don’t think it’s something I value enough to test. PSA, above.

Using the pre-installed game, Crisis 2 looked great on the U2713HM, with high brightness and dramatic color despite the lack of a glossy screen. However, unlike the movies, the problems with color tint were not noticeable here.

Gaming looks gorgeous. Josh Miller

To check the refresh rate, I used DisplayMate graphics motion tests and looked at a number of colored blocks as they moved across the screen at different speeds. The U2713HM displayed blocks of medium-sized images as they moved around the screen, but I did not notice this level of ghosts when actually playing games.

Photos: Looking at the face and fair hair in the pre-installed Standard program, the U2713HM colors are sometimes so slightly submerged in a greenish tint, but the bright colors of the outfit and surroundings fade with brightness.

Recommended settings: Each preset is well suited to its task. However, for general use, I preferred the default setting, adjusting only green to about 83 percent. This gave the monitor a great color balance, perfect for general use.

The U2713HM demonstrates its impressive viewing-angle prowess. Josh Miller

Viewing angle: The optimum viewing angle for the monitor is usually directly in front, about a quarter of the screen down from the top. At this angle, you view the colors as intended by the manufacturer. Most monitors are not designed to be viewed from any other angle. The image quality at sub-optimal angle depends on the type of panel. Most monitors use TN panels that are too bright or too dark on parts of the screen, if you do not look at optimal angles.

Anti-glare (AG) coating also plays a role. Some viewers prefer not to cover at all, while others prefer only a limited number. Still others are completely indifferent; however, AG coating does not adversely affect quality, and its merits, or lack thereof, are strictly dependent on preference.

The U2713HM uses the AH-IPS panel, which provides it with a wider view than TN, and also fits with other high-end IPS displays.

The best way to save on the amount of power your monitor consumes is to make sure it goes to sleep when it’s supposed to. Josh Miller

Here, the AG coating works quite well, retaining most of the prints while maintaining a high contrast, bright appearance; however, the black screen, which looks from an angle, shows some blurred impressions of the environment. This is probably not a problem if you do not plan on constantly bathing it in natural light.

Energy consumption: Armed with LED backlighting, the Dell UltraSharp U2713HM achieved fair power consumption, the default power on / off power was 38.4W, compared to the 93.7W Dell UltraSharp U2711 93.7W in the same test.

In our sleep / standby test, the U2713HM is 0.35 watts and the U2711 is 1.19 watts. Based on our formula, the U2713HM will incur less than half the cost of the U2711, with an annual drawback of $ 11.70, compared with $ 28.78 a year on the U2711.

Versus the U2711
The U2711 has more color depth than the U2713HM (8-bit vs. 16-bit) with a wider color gamut (102 percent NTSC vs. 72 percent U2713HM). The U2711 also includes pre-calibrated pre-installed Adobe RGB software, while the U2713HM only rises to sRGB.

If these numbers mean something to you (for the vast majority of them they won’t be), you might want to consider going with the U2711; however, most of you will be more than happy with the demo performance of the U2713HM. Although the U2711 has more impressive features, the U2713HM images just look better, so unless you have the specific needs of a pre-installed Adobe RGB or 10-bit color, the U2713HM is a better buy.

In addition, Dell says the U2713HM is not a replacement for the U2711 line and looks forward to announcing a replacement for the U2711 at some point in the future.

Brightness
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Apple Thunderbolt Display
361 Samsung S27A850
334 Dell UltraSharp U2711
333 Samsung LS27B970
274 Dell U2713HM
240

Contrast
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Apple Thunderbolt Display
977:1 Dell UltraSharp U2711
947:1 Dell U2713HM
883:1 Samsung LS27B970
878:1 Samsung S27A850
811:1

Performance
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Samsung LS27B970
98 Dell UltraSharp U2711
98 Dell U2713HM
98 Samsung S27A850
97 Apple Thunderbolt Display
97

Juice box
Dell U2713HM Average watts per hour
On (default luminance) 38.4
On (max luminance) 45.5
On (min luminance) 17.8
Sleep 0.35
Calibrated (200 cd/m2) 40.5
Annual power consumption cost $11.70
Score Fair

Conclusion
The UltraSharp U2713HM replaces the U2711 as the best overall monitor; however, starting at $ 740, it can be too expensive for most pockets. If money is a concern but you still need a great performer, you should do it Asus PA248Q your first choice.

If money is not an object, $ 2,700 HP Dreamcolor LP2480zx is the most efficient monitor. Just obviously be prepared for your children to inherit your debt.

The U2713HM is the perfect choice for anyone looking for a 27-inch extreme clarity monitor with superb ergonomic support, useful features and a wide range of connections. In addition, the games and movies look great on it.

It doesn’t have all the features of the U2711, but it adds to its overall better performance, USB 3.0 power and other ergonomic settings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *